Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Otto Virtanen vs Henri Laaksonen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Virtanen vs Laaksonen analysis and find out who is favored!
Otto Virtanen vs Henri Laaksonen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Virtanen 1 - 0 Laaksonen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Virtanen has won 46.41% of points on his second serve, while Laaksonen has won 47.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Virtanen, in recent form, has won 52.38% of his opponent's second serve points, while Laaksonen has won 37.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.08% and 10.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Virtanen has saved 58.53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Laaksonen has saved 40% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Virtanen has won 56.06% of matches played (W/L 37/ 29), with Laaksonen winning 27.27% (W/L 6/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Virtanen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 111/ 43), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 15/ 20). Laaksonen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 123/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 15% (W/L 2/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Virtanen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.26% of matches (W/L 21/ 17), where as Laaksonen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 6/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Virtanen winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Virtanen winning 2 and Laaksonen winning 0. The last match between Virtanen and Laaksonen was at the Wimbledon - London, 26-06-2023, Q1 round, Grass with Otto Virtanen getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:53:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Virtanen and Laaksonen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Virtanen winning 0 times and Laaksonen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Virtanen winning 0, and Laaksonen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Virtanen has played against opponents with an average rank of 235.39 while Laaksonen has played against players with an average rank of 328.55.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Virtanen has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Laaksonen has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Virtanen has converted 42.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Laaksonen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
156
Rank
109
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
780
Rank
84
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
60% (184-124)
Career Total W/L
53% (443-388)
63% (22-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$146,665
Career Prize Money
$1,218,340
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Otto Virtanen | Henri Laaksonen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:53:0 | 0:53:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (33/54) | 67% (34/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (27/33) | 59% (20/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (11/21) | 41% (7/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (24/51) | 30% (16/54) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Otto Virtanen
Player
Henri Laaksonen
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Otto Virtanen | Henri Laaksonen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (22/13) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (49/32) | 0% (0/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (402/371) | 33% (6/12) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 94% (16/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.74 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 279 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.67 |
| DFs Total | 139 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:58 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 237.46 | 117 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1371/2360) | 59% (33/56) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (998/1371) | 64% (21/33) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (459/989) | 48% (11/23) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (99/232) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (904/2304) | 20% (9/45) |
| Slam W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 68% (17/8) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (21/33) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (9/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (20/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (20/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 0% (1/0) |
Otto Virtanen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Otto Virtanen
63%
(
99 of
156)
1st Serve %
59%
(
86 of
145)
1
Aces
17
3
Double Faults
7
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
58 of
86)
46%
(
26 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
42%
(
65 of
156)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
65 of
145)
156
Total Points Won
145
|
4-6 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Otto Virtanen
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Dominic Thiem
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
39 of
75)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Dane Sweeny
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Otto Virtanen
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Otto Virtanen
64%
(
75 of
117)
1st Serve %
46%
(
56 of
122)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
15
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
43%
(
50 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(4) 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Otto Virtanen
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Otto Virtanen
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Henri Laaksonen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Henri Laaksonen
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Laaksonen
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
44
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Henri Laaksonen
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Henri Laaksonen
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
70 of
119)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
51 of
119)
112
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Goncalo Falcao
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joao Domingues
Player
Henri Laaksonen
45%
(
30 of
66)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
89)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moez Echargui
Player
Henri Laaksonen
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Jesse Flores
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
53)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Henri Laaksonen
67%
(
8 of
12)
1st Serve %
40%
(
8 of
20)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
21
Total Points Won
11
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Virtanen Vs Laaksonen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
